Monday, January 28, 2013
India without Indians
Monday, July 11, 2011
A New International India
Subhas Chandra Bose and many others were adamantly opposed to a standing army. Army’s not only eats away the countries money but also takes its blood. And it just keeps getting worse, politician may say that armed personal are there to defend our freedom but in reality they are fighting and dying to make the rich richer and create endless new enemies for the state.
How can any government justify spending 2.8% of countries
GDP on defense related purpose when still after 62 years of Independence we are
looked down as a poor country? We have people been starving for millions of
years and instead of giving them a better future our country spends billions
for becoming a super power and competing in a mad race of power, fame and
money.Friday, July 1, 2011
Rising Oil Prices
2. Weakest Link first ever page rank: 3/10.
Tuesday, April 12, 2011
Corruption: Part 1
Over the last few months the word Corruption is been consistently in the news. The word baffled me enough to look for its actual meaning. And, I must say that no other site would quench your thirst better then the Wikipedia. Vote for the post at INDIVINE, Click Here
Image Source: Google
Tuesday, April 5, 2011
World Cup ’11: A Weakest Review
Sunday, February 13, 2011
A week that went by
Wednesday, January 26, 2011
India Burned
2. India burned when its citizens acted like butchers, killing each other horrendously.
3. India burned when its father of nation was assassinated.
4. India burned when it was demarcated and states were formed on linguistic lines.
5. India burned when merit took the backseat and caste became the primary criteria for imparting education.
6. India burned when it became a tradition of amending Constitution for one’s vested interests.
7. India burned when its people took to street demanding freedom.
8. India burned when corruption charges were levied on PM.
9. India burned when there were riots throughout the country.
10. India burned when a foreigner guilty of remiss causing a holocaust was let free and provided a free passage out of the country.
12. India burned when “below the table” approach engulfed all the government offices.
13. India burned when public money was used to disturb the proceedings of Parliament.
14. India burned when its policy maker took it as an insult to cut down there illegitimate expenses.
15. India burned when law and medicine slipped into the possession of powerful and wealthy.
16. India burned when instead of opening education centers tons of public money was spent on the beautification of cities.
18. India burned when brutal laws were imposed on parts of the country.
19. India burned when it was bombarded with terrorist attacks.
20. India burned when conspirators were given a safe haven within the country.
21. India burned when independent character of state institutions was compromised and endangered.
22. India burned when half the population of it lived below the poverty line, making it even hard to get one time meal during the day.
23. India burned when the gap between India and Bharat broadened.
24. India burned when problems like child labor, illiteracy and crime against women aggravated.
25. India burns when its citizens have to pen down such an article.
Like this post @ IndiVine
Image source: Google
Friday, January 7, 2011
Afghanistan Current Position Part 2
Image Source: Google Images
Quotation: Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi
Tuesday, January 4, 2011
Kashmir: The Troubled Frontier
Yesterday, I read a news article about the ongoing debate whether the Kashmir is an integral part of India or not. A noted novelist had made a comment saying Kashmir was never a part of India and now it’s the right time for Indian government to liberate it. This post contains mine observation regarding the mention topic.Britishers brought in with them a centralized form of governance. They united all big and small princely states under one umbrella; in simple language they unified the great Indian Subcontinent. But, Britishers unlike Mughals never invaded India with a motive of being a part of it; instead they only wanted to loot its immense wealth. They can be compared with modern day Taliban. Only difference was that the Britishers were an organized army of robbers.
So, after World War 2 when the world power scenario changed and it became difficult (almost impossible) to rule India, Britishers came up with a new ideology. They could have transformed the power as was vested in the hands of Britishers. But, they went ahead with a new idea of handing over the power to group of people from each community or religion. It was not just the Britishers but also the Allied forces who never wanted to leave the great Indian Subcontinent. They knew that this land had all the elements to become world power again, which could be a trouble for them in future. As a matter of fact, they still control the politics of some countries of the region like Afghanistan and Pakistan. So, they coined the theory of partitioning the country on religious lines. It was left over to rulers of princely states whether to remain with free India or go with the new state of Pakistan.
Sardar Vallabhai Patel with his group of loyal administrators did a commendable job by making most of the princely states to remain with free India either by using political pressure or by force. But, the Maharaja of Kashmir was an ambitious and very arrogant man. He neither wanted to be a part of free India or the new state of Pakistan. In-fact, he wanted to divide India further by making Kashmir a third country to be formed beside Pakistan. But, soon he realized his mistake when the Mujahedeen backed by the Pakistani army attacked the princely state of Kashmir. He realized that it was better to be a part of a secular India rather than to be a part of a country like Pakistan which was formed on religious grounds. He signed the annexation papers and formally the state of Kashmir became an integral part of the Union of India. Later on, acting like a fatherly figure India gave few chunks of Kashmir to Pakistan in order to calm it down. As it is said, the greediness never goes away, so was the case here; Pakistan from the very moment of its formation wanted Kashmir to be an integral part of it. When it became clear that India has a better military then that of the Pakistan, they went ahead with the new setup. And that was building, supporting and providing logistics for cross border terrorism into the territory of India.
Two points should be made very clear: Firstly, as hyped, if the Kashmir is set free as an Independent country, sooner or later the state of Pakistan back by the China would attack it and would enslave them. In that case only one country, the Union of India, can come to their rescue. Secondly, Kashmir will have to depend on India for its resources and daily needs. They will have to import it from the Indian government. In both the scenario, India can never be detached from Kashmir.
In recent media reports I heard some of the Huriyat leaders crying about the double standard of Indian government for the Kashmir. Indian Government never treated Kashmir as an integral part of India and seen it as an outsider, they said. But, they kept mum on the special privileges and autonomy which only the state of Kashmir gets. They cry about the army Special Power Act but never for once they condemned the militancy. Also, the people who think that partition is only way for a permanent solution of the Kashmir problem must for once look at the state of Pakistan.
Lastly, Kashmir was, is and will always be an integral part of the Union of India.
Image Source: Google
Read more about KASHMIR and INDIA at: Wikipedia
Saturday, January 1, 2011
Afghanistan Current Position
Image links: http://www.utne.com/uploadedImages
Friday, May 14, 2010
Are there any Indians left?
Yesterday I got an sms from Johny and it exposes the true nature of so called unity in diversity. We Indians are so proud in our unity in diversity, of our mega size country, several states with various different areas of interest. Even some of us want our once part Pakistan & Bangladesh to again get united with us. But have we learn any lesson from our past, from our history, from the worlds biggest human migration… our PARTITION. What was the major cause behind our country getting partitioned?
NO… not the britishers.
They only did good what was good for them and everyone does so.
The reason behind our separation was we never stood like Indians, we always give preference to ourselves of being Hindu or Muslim or belonging to some other religion.
Just ask any Indian from where he hails too and he will give you the name of any part of the country but he won’t say I am an INDIAN and I hail from the whole country not just any particular part.
When there are racists attack on Indians in foreign countries then so many organizations and many people stood to raise there voice against such barbaric things. But what about the racism which every Indian faces when he moves from one part of the country to another. We call south Indians as Madrasi, there are several jokes on sardars, people from the Hindi heartland are called bhaiyas,Indians who live in hilly areas are called nepali, bahadur or chinkis.. blah blah blah.
So why can’t we call every Indian as only Indian. When we are one country then why people object on the migration of people within the country.
Why the held our politicians are busy in making newer states? When they can’t govern the states then why they contest the elections?
Who says India is not a rich country? Our government spends too much money on some stupid things, can’t understand it at all, making parks and monuments, changing name of the cities, spending crores on several commissions and much more.
Only one thing to end this dialogue…
Jaago Bhartiyun, Jaago..!!!
Friday, March 12, 2010
National shame
We Indians have this peculiar habit of insulting ourselves better then the others. We have few things of national importance which we should respect and should always strive hard to protect them and one such thing is our National anthem 'Jan Gan Man'. But what are we doing with it, we sing it everywhere, anytime, in any manner without knowing the rules of how to sing it. I know some people will say that hey were not aware about any rules regarding national anthem. I can understand t if they are illiterate people but what about those people who are learned illiterate, what excuse will they give.
People should have some respect towards our national symbols. They are our identity, by them only the other people around the globe recognizes us and respect us and if we only behave in such a childish idiotic way then who will care for us. National anthem binds us in one fabric, it reflects the unity in diversity of the great India.
It hurts when some one say what will happen if I will sing the song under the roof without knowing the damage he is doing to himself only because if we do any damage to our country then it i will directly effect us.
Jana-gana-mana-adhinayaka, jaya he
Bharata-bhagya-vidhata.
Punjab-Sindh-Gujarat-Maratha
Dravida-Utkala-Banga
Vindhya-Himachala-Yamuna-Ganga
Uchchala-Jaladhi-taranga.
Tava shubha name jage,
Tava shubha asisa mange,
Gahe tava jaya gatha,
Jana-gana-mangala-dayaka jaya he
Bharata-bhagya-vidhata.
Jaya he, jaya he, jaya he,
Jaya jaya jaya, jaya he!
The following is Tagore's English rendering of the anthem:
Thou art the ruler of the minds of all people,
Dispenser of India's destiny.
Thy name rouses the hearts of Punjab, Sind,
Gujarat and Maratha,
Of the Dravida and Orissa and Bengal;
It echoes in the hills of the Vindhyas and Himalayas,
mingles in the music of Jamuna and Ganges and is
chanted by the waves of the Indian Sea.
They pray for thy blessings and sing thy praise.
The saving of all people waits in thy hand,
Thou dispenser of India's destiny.
Victory, victory, victory to thee.
From the government official website:
Playing of the Anthem
1.The full version of the Anthem shall be played on the following occasions:
i.Civil and Military investitures;
ii.When National Salute (which means the Command "Rashtriya Salute – Salami Shastr" to the accompaniment of the National Anthem is given on ceremonial occasions to the President or to the Governor/Lieutenant Governor within their respective States/Union Territories;
iii.During parades – irrespective of whether any of the dignitaries referred to in (ii) above is present or not;
iv.On arrival of the President at formal State functions and other functions organized by the Government and mass functions and on his departure from such functions;
v.Immediately before and after the President addresses the Nation over All India Radio;
vi.On arrival of the Governor/Lieutenant Governor at formal State functions within his State/Union Territory and on his departure from such functions;
vii.When the National Flag is brought on parade;
viii.When the Regimental Colours are presented;
ix.For hoisting of colours in the Navy.
2.The short version of the Anthem shall be played when drinking toasts in Messes.
3.The Anthem shall be played on any other occasion for which special orders have been issued by the Government of India.
4.Normally the Anthem shall not be played for the Prime Minister, though there may be special occasions when it may be played.
5.When the National Anthem is played by a band, the Anthem will be preceded by a roll of drums to assist the audience to know that the National Anthem is going to be played, unless there is some other specific indication that the National Anthem is about to be played, as for example, when fanfares are sounded before the National Anthem is played, or when toasts are drunk to the accompaniment of the National Anthem or when the National Anthem constitutes the National Salute given by a Guard of Honour. The duration of the roll, in terms of marching drill, will be 7 paces in slow march. The roll will start slowly, ascend to as loud a volume as possible and then gradually decreases to original softness, but remaining audible until the seventh beat. One beat rest will then be observed before commencing the National Anthem.
Mass Singing of the Anthem
1.The full version of the Anthem shall be played accompanied by mass singing on the following occasions:
i.On the unfurling of the National Flag, on cultural occasions or ceremonial functions other than parades. (This could be arranged by having a choir or adequate size, suitably stationed, which would be trained to coordinate its singing with the band etc. There should be an adequate public audition system so that the gathering in various enclosures can sing in unison with the choir);
ii.On arrival of the President at any Government or Public function (but excluding formal State functions and mess functions) and also immediately before his departure from such functions.
2.On all occasions when the National Anthem is sung, the full version shall be recited accompanied by mass singing.
3.The Anthem may be sung on occasions which, although not strictly ceremonial, are nevertheless invested with significance because of the presence of Ministers etc. The singing of the Anthem on such occasions (with or without the accompaniment of an instruments) accompanied by mass singing is desirable.
4.It is not possible to give an exhaustive list of occasions on which the singing (as distinct from playing) of the Anthem can be permitted. But there is no objection to the singing of the Anthem accompanied by mass singing so long as it is done with due respect as a salutation to the motherland and proper decorum is maintained.
5.In all schools, the day's work may begin with community singing of the anthem. School authorities should make adequate provision in their programmes for popularising the singing of the Anthem and promoting respect for the National Flag among students.
General
1.Whenever the Anthem is sung or played, the audience shall stand to attention. However, when in the course of a newsreel or documentary the Anthem is played as a part of the film, it is not expected of the audience to stand as standing is bound to interrupt the exhibition of the film and would create disorder and confusion rather than add to the dignity of the Anthem.
2.As in the case of the flying of the National Flag, it has been left to the good sense of the people not to indulge in indiscriminate singing or playing of the Anthem.

Friday, February 19, 2010
My Name Is Khan...!!

My name is Khan is a splendid movie, must watch for all the movie freek(like I am). It conveys two messages, one directly and the other indirectly. Well, the direct message will be easily spread by the media and the other who will watch the movie that not all Muslim's are terrorist. But I am afraid about the second message. Its not deep hidden in the movie but quite contrary to it, its the most spoken thing in the movie. But we humans have this tendency to miss something which is most said to us.
So, my dear countrymen its the simple thing that after many years of new attitude in our world politics, we cannot meet the person who actually run them. Take an example of our country, many of the soldier's are dieing or rather put to death in various parts of our country, farmers are committing suicide and students hang themselves and if any one of us( by us I mean WE the INDIANS) want to meet our prime minister or even our MLA to let them know what are our problems and what can be done for removing them can never actually do so because of his some x, y or z security.
Thank God that Panditji is no more to see his fellow junior politicians so much frightened up by some rudely brother (or angry i must add here) comments.
Wednesday, February 3, 2010
INDIA of my dreams
India of my dreams.. India the largest and biggest democracy in the world, an emerging technological hub and lots of development going on yet full of corruption. People still fight on the linguistic dimensions , education and medicines still remain for most country men unaffordable. Yet our PM says we are developing. Media busy in highlighting the previous day night parties and politicians busy on making the democracy "Gunda raaj".
I want India to be self reliable, free from any defects mention earlier. A country where surname doesn't depicts the caste of a person. No demarcations between fellow Indian's on the basis of language, caste, creed, sex, and work. Where its ministers can meet its people fearlessly. A place where education comes first. A Country where voters use their franchise on the basis of the leader's potential to help its people and not because he is a son of the ruling party.
Rabindranath Tagore expressed it beautifully in his words:
"Where the mind is without fear
and the head is held high;
Where knowledge is free;
Where the world has not been
broken up into fragments by
narrow domestic walls;
Where words come out from
the depth of truth;c
Thursday, January 7, 2010
youth for equality

Youth for equality..well i choosed such an title 'coz i want to generate the feelings in the youths especially in fellow Indians that now the time has come to stand united and fight against the evil government and its policies which directly or indirectly effects us. We all know how the government played its policy of appeasement and provided quota's too the soo called backward classes and scheduled castes/tribes. I ask a question from this forum too our great planner's that by always letting a person having some reservations how the government can eliminate the caste biased society of our's. The government is playing the game by which they want to divide this society into castes and religions. If a person of ST suppose gets a seat in higher education just 'coz of his caste then for his whol life his friends, his acquintances and more importantly his soul will not let him forget that he had been born in a ST family.
Moreover, instead of giving quota's government should provide the backward people( by economy) funds so that they can go for higher education. If a general category student won't be able to get a seat just 'coz of his caste then for his whole life he will hate backward caste people, hence acting on the government policy of hatred. Instead none should go for demanding reservation. Everyone should darken general block in his/er form.
Tuesday, January 5, 2010
Can't we re-unite Again?
Why cant we unite again by forgetting our past?
This will not be the first case in the history where two countries have united again. Brutish Britishers and incompetency of our leaders malign our country to such a level where partitioned was the only respite. But, that was more than 63 years ago. So, don't you think it's the right time to burn our hatred and join hands together for a better future?
Why not bring Sri Lanka, Bangaldesh, and Bhutan also a beneficiary of the treaty. I know there is an organization named SAARC, but we all know that it only exists in conference hall and in big talks. I haven't included Nepal because informally they are a part of India.


